Controversial game designer Peter Molyneux wants to prove that "not everything I say is a broken promise.

General
Controversial game designer Peter Molyneux wants to prove that "not everything I say is a broken promise.

It's been a while since I heard from Peter Molyneux, developer of the original "Fable" and "Theme Park," who has lost his reputation over the years for experimenting with blockchain games and other shortcomings surrounding his promises. Perhaps worst of all, he promised an acorn to sprout on an oak tree in "Fable" and never delivered.

The betrayal still haunts me.

Speaking to GamesIndustry.biz, Molyneux details what he has been doing since the controversy surrounding his game, Curiosity, cooled. The game, which promised to provide winners with a life-changing experience but instead left them disappointed, has caused a lot of controversy around his work over the years.

"It used to take an enormous amount of time in the press," Molyneux said. After a while, however, everything suddenly subsided and he began to wonder what to do with his spare time.

"What I decided to do was go back to being a coder. So I worked on code for a long time. I started as a coder, not as a designer. And I love it, I love it so much. I love it, but I'm an introvert."

Currently, Molyneux is working on a game called MOAT, set in the world of Albion. He keeps people up to date through his new blog, where he tells more about the game, but also gives the interviewer a bit of a tease: "I'm working on a game called MOAT, which is set in the world of Albion.

"Today, every sentence, every word is analyzed and broken down, and people say, 'The game has to be this way, the game has to be this way.' But the journey of an idea from the first moment you think, 'wouldn't it be cool to make a game about something,' to actually producing the game is a very long and complicated one," he says. 13]

"I used to like to explore ideas with people before the game was finished, which was my trademark, but it got me into a lot of trouble."

"I had a lot of trouble with my own blog.

Regarding his own blog, he states that he "really tries to combat the idea that everything I say is a broken promise."

When asked what he would change if he could go back in time, Molyneux listed several things.

"I would go back and say what was in the cube for Curiosity. That means I was insanely naïve. I figured that saying there was something magical in the cube would be more motivating than saying what it was."

"Secondly, in the Fable world, you didn't say anything about acorns or oak trees.

Of course, the interviewer asked about the disappointment of Curiosity's win. Of course, the interviewer asked about the disappointment of Curiosity's victory. "We just respected it, but if I had said, 'What's in the middle, it's up to you to get there,' Curiosity would have been my 'exoneration.'"

Categories